Blog

The New York State and, particularly, the New York City real estate markets are characterized by high stakes, intricate transactions, and significant financial investments. Within this dynamic environment, purchase, sale, and lease agreements form the bedrock of countless deals. However, when one party fails to uphold their end of the bargain, a breach of contract occurs, often leading to complex and contentious litigation. For individuals and businesses navigating these challenges, understanding the legal landscape is paramount. Figeroux & Associates, located at 26 Court Street, Suite 701, Brooklyn, NY 11242, stands ready to provide expert legal guidance in these matters. This analysis delves into the fundamental aspects of real estate contract breaches under New York State (NYS) and New York City (NYC) law.   

The Foundation: Establishing a Breach of Contract in New York

Under New York law, a breach of contract claim requires proof of four essential elements:

1. The existence of a valid, enforceable contract.
2. Performance of the contract by the plaintiff (the party bringing the lawsuit).
3. Breach of the contract by the defendant.
4. Resulting damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the breach.

Crucially, for real estate agreements, New York’s Statute of Frauds (General Obligations Law § 5-703) mandates that contracts for the sale of real property, or leases exceeding one year, must be in writing. This written agreement must contain the essential terms – identifying the parties, describing the subject property, stating the price or consideration, outlining payment terms, and often specifying a closing date – and be signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. Failure to include all essential terms can render a contract unenforceable. Furthermore, inherent in every NY contract is the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, requiring parties to act honestly and not frustrate the other party’s ability to receive the benefits of the agreement.   

A breach can manifest in different ways: a material breach significantly undermines the contract’s core purpose, potentially excusing the non-breaching party from further performance and allowing them to sue for damages. A minor breach is less severe, not defeating the contract’s purpose, but still entitling the non-breaching party to seek damages for the specific violation. An anticipatory breach occurs when one party unequivocally declares, through words or actions, their intention not to perform before the performance date arrives.   

Common Breaches in Purchase and Sale Agreements

The high volume and value of NYC real estate transactions make breaches in purchase and sale agreements unfortunately common. Disputes frequently arise over:

• Buyer Breaches: 
  • Failure to Secure Financing: Buyers often rely on mortgage contingencies. Failure to secure a loan commitment by the contractual deadline, often due to insufficient funds, credit issues, or sometimes, a lack of diligent effort (potentially violating good faith), constitutes a breach.
  • Failure to Tender Deposit/Balance: Not providing the initial deposit or failing to pay the full purchase price at closing is a fundamental breach.   
  • Defaulting on Contingencies: Contracts often contain contingencies beyond financing, such as satisfactory home inspections or the successful sale of the buyer’s current property. Failure to meet these obligations within the agreed timeframes can lead to breach.   
  • Misrepresentations: Providing false information in financial disclosures or other application materials.
• Seller Breaches: 
  • Improperly Backing Out: Sellers might get cold feet or receive a higher offer, but refusing to close without a legally valid reason (like a buyer’s breach or failure of a contingency benefiting the seller) is a breach.   
  • Failure to Deliver Clean Title: Sellers must typically convey marketable title, free from undisclosed liens, encumbrances, or defects. Failure to cure identified title issues before closing can be a breach.   
  • Failure to Disclose Known Defects: While NY largely follows the “caveat emptor” (buyer beware) principle, sellers cannot actively conceal known material defects or make fraudulent misrepresentations about the property’s condition.   
  • Not Completing Agreed Repairs: If the contract stipulates specific repairs the seller must complete before closing, failure to do so constitutes a breach.
  • Disputes Over Closing Adjustments/Escrow: Disagreements regarding the proration of taxes, utilities, or the handling of the contract deposit held in escrow are frequent triggers for disputes.

Breaches in Residential and Commercial Leases

Lease agreements are also fertile ground for disputes:

• Tenant Breaches: Beyond non-payment of rent, tenants may breach by: violating use clauses (e.g., running an unauthorized business), making prohibited alterations, having unauthorized occupants or pets, illegal subletting, or creating a nuisance.   
• Landlord Breaches: Landlords breach by: failing to provide essential services (violating the Warranty of Habitability implied in residential leases), not making necessary repairs as required by the lease or law, interfering with the tenant’s “quiet enjoyment” of the premises, or engaging in illegal eviction practices.
• NYC Rent Stabilization Context: For the roughly one million rent-stabilized apartments in NYC, specific regulations add layers of complexity. Landlords breaching the Rent Stabilization Law (RSL) – for instance, by refusing to offer a mandatory renewal lease without a valid legal reason (like proven owner occupancy after following strict notice procedures), failing to provide the required RSL lease rider, or attempting improper deregulation – face legal challenges and potential penalties.   

Contingencies: Navigating Conditions Precedent

Contingencies are critical clauses allowing parties to withdraw from a contract without penalty if specific conditions aren’t met. Common in NY/NYC include:   

• Financing Contingency: Allows the buyer time (often 30-45 days) to secure a mortgage commitment.
• Appraisal Contingency: Protects the buyer if the property appraises for less than the purchase price, potentially allowing renegotiation or cancellation.   
• Inspection Contingency: Allows the buyer to have the property inspected and potentially withdraw or negotiate repairs based on the findings.
• Co-op Board Approval (NYC Specific): Unique to cooperative apartments, the sale is contingent upon the building’s board approving the buyer. Buyers must submit a detailed application in good faith. Rejection usually voids the contract, returning the deposit, unless the buyer acted in bad faith (e.g., intentionally sabotaging the interview or application). Conditional approvals (e.g., requiring maintenance escrow) may give the buyer the option to cancel if the contract stipulated unconditional consent.   

Remedies for Breach of Contract in New York

When a breach occurs, the non-breaching party may seek various remedies:

1. Monetary Damages: The most common remedy, aimed at compensating the injured party for their losses. This can include compensatory damages (direct losses), consequential damages (foreseeable indirect losses), and incidental damages (costs incurred due to the breach).
2. Liquidated Damages: A pre-agreed sum stipulated in the contract to be paid upon a specific breach. In NY real estate sales, this is often the buyer’s down payment. To be enforceable, the amount must be a reasonable estimate of the potential damages at the time the contract was signed, and actual damages must have been difficult to ascertain. Courts will strike down liquidated damages clauses deemed to be unreasonable penalties. The burden is on the party challenging the clause to prove it’s a penalty.   
3. Specific Performance: An equitable remedy where the court orders the breaching party to perform their contractual obligation. Because real property is considered unique, buyers often seek specific performance to compel a seller to complete the sale. To obtain specific performance, the plaintiff must show a valid contract exists, they were ready, willing, and able to perform, the defendant could perform, and that monetary damages are an inadequate remedy.   
4. Rescission: This cancels the contract, effectively unwinding the deal and restoring parties to their pre-contract positions. It’s often sought in cases of fraud or mutual mistake.   

Litigation and Prevention

Breach of contract lawsuits in New York must generally be filed within six years from the date of the breach for written contracts (CPLR § 213(2)). The litigation process involves filing pleadings, discovery (exchanging information), potential motions, and ultimately, either a settlement or a trial.   

Preventing breaches starts with meticulous contract drafting. Clear, unambiguous language defining obligations, deadlines, and contingencies is crucial. Thorough due diligence – inspections, title searches, financial reviews – helps identify potential issues early. Engaging experienced legal counsel like Figeroux & Associates (855-768-8845, www.askthelawyer.us) is vital for negotiating fair terms, ensuring compliance with NYS and NYC law, and protecting your interests throughout the transaction.   

Conclusion

Breaches of real estate contracts in New York present significant challenges, involving complex legal principles and potentially substantial financial consequences. From the strict requirements of the Statute of Frauds to the nuances of liquidated damages, specific performance, and NYC-specific regulations like Rent Stabilization and co-op board approvals, navigating these disputes demands skilled legal expertise. Whether buying, selling, or leasing property, understanding your rights and obligations is critical. The attorneys at Figeroux & Associates (855-768-8845 | www.askthelawyer.us) possess the knowledge and experience necessary to guide clients through these complexities, advocating vigorously whether at the negotiation table or in court, ensuring their clients’ contractual rights are protected.